§ 76.76. Backfitting.

816 words·~4 min read·/us/cfr/t10/s§ 76.76·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)(1) Backfitting is defined as the modification of, or addition to, systems, structures, or components of a plant; or to the procedures or organization required to operate a plant; any of which may result from a new or amended provision in the Commission rules or the imposition of a regulatory staff position interpreting the Commission rules that is either new or different from a previous NRC staff position.

(2)Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the Commission shall require a systematic and documented analysis pursuant to paragraph

(b)of this section for backfits which it seeks to impose.

(3)Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the Commission shall require the backfitting of a plant only when it determines, based on the analysis described in paragraph

(b)of this section, that there is a substantial increase in the overall protection of the public health and safety or the common defense and security to be derived from the backfit and that the direct and indirect costs of implementation for that plant are justified in view of this increased protection.

(4)The provisions of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section are inapplicable and, therefore, backfit analysis is not required and the standards in paragraph (a)(3) of this section do not apply where the Commission or staff, as appropriate, finds and declares, with appropriately documented evaluation for its finding, any of the following:

(i)That a modification is necessary to bring a plant into compliance with a certificate or the rules or orders of the Commission, or into conformance with written commitments by the Corporation; or

(ii)That regulatory action is necessary to ensure that the plant provides adequate protection to the health and safety of the public and is in accord with the common defense and security; or

(iii)That the regulatory action involves defining or redefining what level of protection to the public health and safety or common defense and security should be regarded as adequate.

(5)The Commission shall always require the backfitting of a plant if it determines that the regulatory action is necessary to ensure that the plant provides adequate protection to the health and safety of the public and is in accord with the common defense and security.

(6)The documented evaluation required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section must include a statement of the objectives of and reasons for the modification and the basis for invoking the exception. If immediate effective regulatory action is required, then the documented evaluation may follow, rather than precede, the regulatory action.

(7)If there are two or more ways to achieve compliance with a certificate or the rules or orders of the Commission, or with written Corporation commitments, or there are two or more ways to reach a level of protection which is adequate, then ordinarily the Corporation is free to choose the way which best suits its purposes. However, should it be necessary or appropriate for the Commission to prescribe a specific way to comply with its requirements or to achieve adequate protection, then cost may be a factor in selecting the way, provided that the objective of compliance or adequate protection is met.

(b)In reaching the determination required by paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Commission will consider how the backfit should be scheduled in light of other ongoing regulatory activities at the plant and, in addition, will consider information available concerning any of the following factors as may be appropriate and any other information relevant and material to the proposed backfit:

(1)Statement of the specific objectives that the proposed backfit is designed to achieve;

(2)General description of the activity that would be required by the Corporation in order to complete the backfit;

(3)Potential change in the risk to the public from the accidental release of radioactive material;

(4)Potential impact on radiological exposure of facility employees;

(5)Installation and continuing costs associated with the backfit, including the cost of plant downtime;

(6)The potential safety impact of changes in plant or operational complexity, including the relationship to proposed and existing regulatory requirements;

(7)The estimated resource burden on the NRC associated with the proposed backfit and the availability of such resources;

(8)The potential impact of differences in plant type, design, or age on the relevancy and practicality of the proposed backfit; and

(9)Whether the proposed backfit is interim or final and, if interim, the justification for imposing the proposed backfit on an interim basis.

(c)No certificate will be withheld during the pendency of backfit analyses required by the Commission's rules.

(d)The Executive Director for Operations shall be responsible for implementation of this section, and all analyses required by this section shall be approved by the Executive Director for Operations or his or her designee. [59 FR 48960, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6671, Feb. 12, 1997]

Connections10 cite this

Cited by 10 sections

Citation graph

cites case law

§ 76.76

Backfitting.

Fed. Reg.×10

Cites 0Cited by 10 across 1 source